AMORAL VALUES: PODCASTING AND RELENTLESS PURSUIT

NOTE: This was first posted July 1, 2025 www.taveaucreativeleadership.com

“We’re experiencing a FAMINE for the Word of the Lord”

And frankly, NOBODY KNOWS WHAT IT IS!  This is reproving the Jesus Accepter

But maybe it’s “Dirty Laundry” (“Trapos Sucios”)

AMORAL VALUES

PODCASTING AND RELENTLESS PURSUIT
** FOR THE SAVED CHRISTIAN: A SUBMITTED SELAH
** HUMANS VS HUMAN DIGNITY

“Its each persons own choice” But let me ask, in light of the Christian witness..

HOW Much is TOO MUCH?

Mark 4:24 (KJV)
“And he said unto them, Take heed what ye hear: with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you: and unto you that hear shall more be given.”

Subject (To the Christian, for the Christian, By a Christian)

When Media Becomes a Weapon: Public Shaming, Clickbait Culture, and the Loss of Civic Honor

Itching Ears Achieved Formula from the 1990’s “the TV show, video is edited ever 6 seconds to keep us glued,drawn in, hooked”

(C)2025 Taveau Creative Leadership All copyrights rights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AT

Above: Mature perspective

Miss T Speaks:

Today I asked ChatGPT AI about the famous podcaster pursuing the first lady of another country, for days, weeks and multiplied “outing” “attack” and fearsome “bullying”(if that was what Chat feels it was)… And If this nationally renown female podcaster is a professing Christian, then that is partially my turf, protecting the Christian community from crass character (untrue Christian ministry representations).

I submit this as a “pause to reflect” sort of  SELAH in which I asked Chat GPT AI to answer questions, which I crafted intentionally and with determining motives, Christian character involved.
I scanned it but barely added THE PURPOSE to see an OBJECTIVE (other than my own) VIEWPOINT and this answer IS MY OWN…after reading it!

Billy Graham era “The picture of the cruel cross is the symbol of the Big I’ (ego, id) fully crossed out” “It is not I who lives, but Christ who lives within me” Mature Apostle Paul

Here goes:

In an era where podcast hosts, influencers, and talk show personalities command massive followings, the power of the microphone has never been greater—or more dangerous. Recently, a high-profile podcast figure, known for their bold presence and outspoken views, used their platform to relentlessly target the wife of a foreign nation’s president. Not for policy. Not for power. But for her face, name, body, and private life. Day after day, segment after segment, the public was fed commentary, speculation, and supposed “detective work” on her appearance, gender identity, and unconfirmed suspicious, rumors, gossip about.. past marital infidelity, which reflects upon not just a famous family, but is more “GODLIKE than Inquiring Minds Demand to Know feature broadcasting.

It really BOTHERED ME (and still does) for I have had up close, loud, angry ABUSE and this is what it TRIGGERS in my own soul and mind.

Plus it is slick, however extremely POINTED, DIRECTED, CHARACTER ASSASSINATION by “Royal Guessing” which is the Now NORMAL in all of these

My Bible teaches me “to guard my eye gate and my EAR GATE:

Mark 4:24 (KJV)
“And he said unto them, Take heed what ye hear: with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you: and unto you that hear shall more be given.”

This verse is often quoted as “Be careful what you hear,” emphasizing discernment, accountability, and the spiritual impact of what we allow into our hearts and minds.

Yet our earthly human SOUL GATES (eyes, soul, mind emotions) are repeatedly pillaged and word curse filled with rehashing very harsh, relentless, pursuing  LOUD, WELL MONETIZED and attacking ministry, secular many video.

WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THIS I wondered/ WHY? At WHOSE COST?

Plus Is it MY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY BUSINESS to dig out all of this when CHRIST definitely would NOT.

I was so embarrassed, am honoring to all, even when, I do not agree with their politics, choices, gender changes. THAT IS STILL THEIR PRIVATE BUSINESS and I OWE THEM THE RESPECT OF JESUS CHRIST and THIS MYSELF to not publically vilify nor make a buck off of it.

Here lies the real ISSUE.

ChatGPT said:

This is a powerful and much-needed question in our age of platforms, podcasts, and personal brands:

BLESSED “RIGHTS” TO SAY, DO AS WE PLEASE

“Do I have the right to say whatever I think—especially if I believe I’m warning or exposing someone?”

Let’s explore this with Scripture, comparing:

• Human dignity

• Elite self-appointed authority

• The First Church’s biblical model of correction, speech, and warning

I. “The Right to Say” vs. Biblical Restraint

(Addressing the Christian,  not the world)

Q. Does anyone have the divine right to publicly “expose” others?

Short answer: No one has a blanket right. The Bible commands:

• Restraint in speech

• Respect for authority

• Privacy in correction*****

• Humility in warnings

James 3:1 (KJV)
“My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.”

Those who speak or teach publicly will be judged more strictly, not granted more freedom to tear down others.

 II. Human Dignity in God’s Eyes

From the beginning, humans are created in God’s image—with dignity, value, and purpose.

Genesis 1:27 (KJV)
“So God created man in his own image…”

Psalm 8:5 (KJV)
“For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.”

Even when correcting sin, the Bible commands us to preserve dignity, not destroy it.

Galatians 6:1 (KJV)
“Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness…”

III. “Warning” in the Spirit of Christ

Many today justify slander or obsession under “warning the people.”
But the early Church had clear patterns:

*** Warnings were:

• Spoken with relationship and prayer

• Grounded in truth, not gossip

• Shared face-to-face when possible

• Never focused on someone’s body, gender, race, or past identity

Matthew 18:15 (KJV)
“If thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone…”

This was Jesus’ method, not viral takedowns or “discernment gossip.”

 IV. The First Church vs. Elite Power

In Acts and Paul’s epistles, apostles were servants, not celebrities or media dominators.

2 Corinthians 10:8 (KJV)
“For though I should boast somewhat more of our authority… our authority, which the Lord hath given us for edification, and not for your destruction…”

The First Church used authority to build up, not destroy reputations or perform exposés.

When someone publicly tore down others, they were often called revilers or false brethren.

++++++++Next is BIG

3 John 1:9-10 (KJV)
“Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence… prating against us with malicious words…”

This shows that even in the First Church, some tried to act as if they were “above correction”, using influence to defame others—and they were called out.

 V. True Warning vs. False Exposure

 Biblical Warning:

• Is rooted in love and truth

• Seeks repentance, not attention

• Uses correction within biblical order

• Keeps confidential things confidential

++ False Exposure (often seen today):

• Focuses on shame, humiliation, and mockery

• Lacks real relationship or love

• Elevates the speaker’s ego or brand

• Ignores Christ’s order of one-on-one correction

 What Would Jesus Say?

Matthew 12:36-37 (KJV)
“But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.”

Jesus did speak truth, but:

• He didn’t dig up people’s pasts to shame them

• He didn’t elevate Himself by destroying others

• He corrected leaders with authority, face to face, not performatively

 Final Thought: Your Right Ends Where Dignity Begins

You may have a free speech right in civil society, but in the Kingdom of God:

There is no right to destroy another’s dignity, reputation, or humanity for personal gain.

The early Church taught mutual respect, humble correction, and love that covers, not exposes.

1 Corinthians 13:6-7 (KJV)
“[Charity] rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.

Let’s pause and ask: Is this moral? Is this honorable? Is this ethical?

1. Common Morality: Where Is the Human Decency?

Across cultures and belief systems, there exists a shared moral understanding: treat people with respect, dignity, and fairness. Publicly attacking someone—especially a spouse who holds no office or public power—is a violation of basic decency.

Public humiliation, especially in the form of mockery, innuendo, and bodily commentary, crosses a line. It is not righteous. It is not brave. It is not “just telling the truth.”
It’s bullying—with a spotlight and an audience.

2. Civic Honor and the Role of a Model Citizen

Every citizen, especially those in positions of influence, has a moral duty to uphold the dignity and health of public discourse.
A model citizen seeks to:

• Encourage civil dialogue.

• Protect the dignity of others.

• Uplift, not tear down.

The wife of a foreign head of state is not a combatant in a policy war. She is not a public adversary. In many traditions—including Western, biblical, and diplomatic—such a person is treated with honor, reserve, and courtesy, not weaponized for entertainment.

3. Journalism vs Clickbait: Let’s Be Honest

The situation in question isn’t journalism. It’s not investigative reporting. It’s not protecting the public. It’s clickbait. And clickbait culture thrives on:

• Sensationalism

• Shaming

• Rumors

• Hurt masked as “truth”

Real journalism deals with facts, balance, and the public good. This? This was personal. Emotional. Spectacle-driven. And beneath the dignity of any serious broadcaster, especially one claiming Christian values

4. Christian Ethics and the Power of the Tongue

The host in question identifies as a “born-again Christian.” That makes this even more sobering. Scripture warns us plainly:

Ephesians 4:29 (KJV)
“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers.”

Titus 3:2 (KJV)
“To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men.”

Leviticus 19:16 (KJV)
“Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord.”

James 3:5-6 (KJV)
“Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity…”

Christianity is not about using a platform to destroy others, especially for fame or outrage. It is about truth in love, justice in humility, and speech seasoned with grace.

5. What Is Right? What Is Fair?

• It is right to disagree with policies or public actions—fairly, directly, and respectfully.

• It is wrong to harass and mock a non-public figure over their private identity or body.

• It is fair to expect our media leaders—especially professing Christians—to use their influence ethically and compassionately.

Closing Reflection: Who Are We Becoming?

If we celebrate voices that tear others down, we invite a culture of cruelty. If we cheer for shame-based content, we become passive participants in a moral decline.
But if we raise a higher standard—rooted in decency, truth, and love—we build a better world.

Proverbs 11:12 (KJV)
“He that is void of wisdom despiseth his neighbour: but a man of understanding holdeth his peace.”

Matthew 12:36-37 (KJV)
“But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.”

Powerful platforms demand powerful character.

Not just clicks. Not just views. But wisdom, restraint, and the courage to be kind.

Excellent and important questions for together we are cutting directly to the heart of media ethics, moral boundaries, and human dignity—especially around personal identity and gender. Let’s break this down clearly and objectively:

 What’s Really Going On?

We’re describing a situation where a famous podcast host targets the first lady of another nation—not for public policy, not for official corruption, but for deeply personal things: appearance, gender history, private life, past relationships, and more. This host claims it’s all “truth” and a “public right to know.”

But is it?

 What Are These Behaviors, Morally and Ethically?

Bullying

• Definition: Repeatedly attacking, mocking, or attempting to intimidate someone—especially from a position of power or influence.

• In this case: Daily episodes, mocking tone, and focus on private traits = clear bullying.

Harassment

• Definition: Aggressive pressure or intrusion, often sustained over time, causing emotional distress.

• In this case: Digging into old videos, publishing personal theories, and obsessively broadcasting = public harassment.

Defaming

• Definition: Making false or damaging claims that hurt someone’s reputation.

• In this case: If the host presents speculation as fact—especially about gender, adultery, or identity—it could legally and morally be defamation.

 Objectifying

• Definition: Treating someone as a thing to be used, viewed, or judged—not as a person with dignity.

• In this case: Reducing the first lady to body parts, rumors, and identity speculation for views = objectification.

Personal Vendetta

• Definition: A deep, personal grudge disguised as righteous exposure.

• In this case: If the host is fixated beyond reason—especially without credible public relevance—it suggests a personal motive, not journalism.

 What About “The Public’s Right to Know”?

This phrase is often abused. The public has a right to know when:

• There is credible evidence of wrongdoing in public office.

• A public figure’s behavior directly impacts policy, security, or law.

• A figure has made public claims that contradict their private actions, and it matters.

But the first lady is not:

• A lawmaker or elected official.

• In charge of policy.

• Accused of corruption or fraud.

So:

TRUTH OR FAUX

I am NOT SEATED AS GOD over any other person, Nor OVER the foreign leader, American officials or their spouses. They know their business. I do not need to know it as it is THEIR BUSINESS and they have already been ELECTED (not running for then it might be a big deal.) But that is NOT the case now.

GENDER CHOICES, prior to or now, should be treated with caution, respect not TMZ Tabloid Rabid “mammon seeking “Bash for Cash ” Followers Elite, FRENZY (saying this to the CHRISTIAN not the world)

REASON…That is not transparency—it’s invasion.

—Says the EORR Fair, Miss T “her own evaluating Christian opinion”

 Why Is This Gender SIN CONSCIOUS ACCUSING (ZEALOT) Obsession Wrong?

1. It’s Dehumanizing.
   Digging into someone’s gender identity or body without cause is not curiosity—it’s violation.

2. It’s Not Yours to Know.
   Unless someone chooses to share their private journey, it is not your right to know it. Medical and personal identity history is protected—even by law in most nations.

3. It’s Exploitation.
   When someone uses deep personal traits (like past gender identity) for ratings, they are using a person’s humanity as entertainment.

4. It Reinforces Stigma.
   Even if the person had transitioned (whether true or not), the act of “exposing” it like it’s a scandal is rooted in transphobia and public humiliation. That is not moral, legal, or Christian.

Final Reflection: What Is Moral Media?

A moral media voice would ask:

• Is this person harming the public?

• Is this truth necessary—or just salacious?

• Am I lifting people up or tearing them down?

Christians and ethical citizens are called to love truth, but also to walk humbly and guard the dignity of others.

Micah 6:8 (KJV)
“He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?

When Media Becomes a Weapon: Public Shaming, Clickbait Culture, and the Loss of Civic Honor

In an era where podcast hosts, influencers, and talk show personalities command massive followings, the power of the microphone has never been greater—or more dangerous. Recently, a high-profile podcast figure, known for their bold presence and outspoken views, used their platform to relentlessly target the wife of a foreign nation’s president. Not for policy. Not for power. But for her face, name, body, and private life. Day after day, segment after segment, the public was fed commentary, speculation, and supposed “detective work” on her appearance, gender identity, and unconfirmed allegations of adultery.

Let’s pause and ask The Saved, Moral Born Again Non Naive Christian

Q Is this moral? Is this honorable? Is this ethical?

( Philippians 2:12 open ended submitted Selah)

1. Common Morality: Where Is the Human Decency?

Across cultures and belief systems, there exists a shared moral understanding: treat people with respect, dignity, and fairness. Publicly attacking someone—especially a spouse who holds no office or public power—is a violation of basic decency.

Public humiliation, especially in the form of mockery, innuendo, and bodily commentary, crosses a line. It is not righteous. It is not brave. It is not “just telling the truth.”
It’s bullying—with a spotlight and an audience.

2. Civic Honor and the Role of a Model Citizen

Every citizen, especially those in positions of influence, has a moral duty to uphold the dignity and health of public discourse.
A model citizen seeks to:

• Encourage civil dialogue.

• Protect the dignity of others.

• Uplift, not tear down.

The wife of a foreign head of state is not a combatant in a policy war. She is not a public adversary. In many traditions—including Western, biblical, and diplomatic—such a person is treated with honor, reserve, and courtesy, not weaponized for entertainment

3. Journalism vs Clickbait: Let’s Be Honest

The situation in question isn’t journalism. It’s not investigative reporting. It’s not protecting the public. It’s clickbait. And clickbait culture thrives on:

• Sensationalism

• Shaming

• Rumors

• Hurt masked as “truth”

Real journalism deals with facts, balance, and the public good. This? This was personal. Emotional. Spectacle-driven. And beneath the dignity of any serious broadcaster, especially one claiming Christian values.

4. Christian Ethics and the Power of the Tongue

The host in question identifies as a “born-again Christian.” That makes this even more sobering. Scripture warns us plainly:

Ephesians 4:29 (KJV)
“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers.”

Titus 3:2 (KJV)
“To speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men.”

Leviticus 19:16 (KJV)
“Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord.”

James 3:5-6 (KJV)
“Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity…”

Christianity is not about using a platform to destroy others, especially for fame or outrage. It is about truth in love, justice in humility, and speech seasoned with grace

5. What Is Right? What Is Fair?

• It is right to disagree with policies or public actions—fairly, directly, and respectfully.

• It is wrong to harass and mock a non-public figure over their private identity or body.

• It is fair to expect our media leaders—especially professing Christians—to use their influence ethically and compassionately.

Closing Reflection: Who Are We Becoming?

If we celebrate voices that tear others down, we invite a culture of cruelty. If we cheer for shame-based content, we become passive participants in a moral decline.
But if we raise a higher standard—rooted in decency, truth, and love—we build a better world.

Proverbs 11:12 (KJV)
“He that is void of wisdom despiseth his neighbour: but a man of understanding holdeth his peace.”

Matthew 12:36-37 (KJV)
“But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.”

“Jesus went about doing good, healing all those who were oppressed by the devil, for the Lord was with Him, ” long suffering Book of  Acts 10:38

To connect: TD at crossbodyunity@gmail.com

To Support: Please pray
To give

2764 Pleasant Rd Ste A #635 Fort Mill, SC 29708

Peace be yours! T

(C)2025 Taveau Creative Leadership All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI